人身伤亡,医疗失误,工伤索偿
人身伤亡,医疗失误,工伤索偿
- 为法律援助个案提供意见
- 交通意外索偿,向肇事司机及车主索偿,向保险公司索偿
- 工业意外索偿,包括听力受损、电击受伤、锯切工作时受伤、电梯维修、机械工场意外等
- 工地意外索偿
- 清洁工作意外,包括从高处堕下、搬运重物受伤等
- 厨房工作意外索偿,包括滑倒、切伤、镬具使用时受伤等
- 大厦管理工作意外索偿,包括楼梯滑倒等
- 办公室意外索偿
- 老人院工作意外索偿,包括滑倒、移动老人时受伤等
- 弱智人士宿舍工作意外索偿,包括照顾病人时受伤等
- 政府纪律部队意外索偿
- 物流及运输工作意外索偿,包括搬运重物时受伤等
- 职业病索偿
- 医疗失误索偿,包括未经病人正式同意进行治疗、延误诊断、手术后在病人体内留下手术仪器、没有解释治疗程序、手术过程粗疏、诊断失误、水平低于一般已受训的医护专才应提供的合理水平等
- 雇员补偿
- 提供完整专家名单
The Liability of Dentists in the Provision of Dental Materials Vitus Leung and Brian Darvell
Dental practitioners are thought to be subject to the same principles in relation to the tort of negligence as are medical practitioners. However, in addition to their common law liability, dental practitioners may be more vulnerable to strict liability under the Sale of Goods Ordinance because, unlike medical practitioners, provision of materials is a large part of dental practice. The classification of the provision of dental materials to patients can affect the potential liability of dentists, ie whether there is a contract for the supply of goods, for the supply of services, or something else. This article explores the implications of the Sale of Goods Ordinance and the impact of reforms recently recommended by the Law Reform Commission of Hong Kong on dental practitioners in Hong Kong.